|
 |
|

Photograph:
Roger Parmiter
his
is a description of a fieldwork investigation of Oystermouth castle
undertaken by Y6 and Y7 pupils and their teachers from local primary
and secondary schools in Swansea. The aims were to provide an
understanding of the status and role of the castle within the context
of the Norman invasion and conquest of South Wales, and to develop
pupils' ability to interpret various aspects of the site using the
visible remains and other source material.
Planning
the Investigation
The investigation was organised around a single 'big question': "What
was Oystermouth castle used for?" This was done to give the
investigation a unifying theme and the 'investigators' a clear purpose
to their fieldwork.
The 'big
question' was further divided into four parts: 'Site and Siting',
'Attack and Defence', 'Life in the Castle' (site-based) and 'The
Castle and the Community' (classroom-based). The children were divided
into three groups, each one responsible for investigating one of the
site-based aspects. At the end of the visit, the three groups were
brought together to report back on what they had found and this was
followed by a general discussion, the purpose of which was to throw
some preliminary light on the 'big question'. Back in school, the
children would study additional sources relating to the fourth aspect
(The Castle and the Community). In the final exercise, the children
were able to extend their investigation by comparing Oystermouth with
other castles both locally and in other parts of Wales.
The
crucial decision in any fieldwork activity is how to handle contextual
material. There are at least three kinds of context to be considered:
- Historical
context:
- this
helps children to locate the castle within an account of prior and
subsequent events or developments. This will enable them to answer
questions, for example, about why the castle was built, why it was
built on a particular site, what function it performed and how long
it was used.
- Interpretive
context:
- additional
material, primary or secondary that will help children to interpret
the site itself. This might take the form of information about
methods of constructing large buildings, about architectural detail,
about the possibilities and limitations of medieval technology, or
about the people and facilities needed to sustain the daily routines
of castle life.
- Comparative
context:
- this
allows children to compare the castle with other similar sites. It
enables them to answer questions about the extent to which the
castle was typical of buildings of its kind in terms of its size,
position and/or function, to identify similarities and differences,
and to offer possible reasons for these.
Sometimes
it is better to allow children to visit the site first without any
detailed information about its historical context. In this situation,
the children may lack information but they do not necessarily lack
knowledge. Research has shown that they bring with them sufficient
ideas (in this case about what castles looked like and were used for)
to enable them to identify obvious features, and to pose questions
about features that are not so obvious or easily understood. The main
work will take place after the visit. Working gradually from
the particular/the known to the general/the unknown, the children
first use additional material to help them interpret what they have
seen and recorded on the site visit. They then use comparative
material to help them establish what kind of castle this was, and
finally, they use a wider historical context to confirm the role the
castle played in the history of this part of South Wales.
Alternatively,
the children work from the general to the particular. This begins with
an introduction to the wider historical context, so that their
interpretations of the site are informed by this wider knowledge.
Following the visit, they use the additional sources to assist their
interpretations of particular features and then comparative data, as
before, to determine matters of typicality.
In this
study, the second approach was adopted, since we wanted the children
to form some provisional conclusions about the castle by the end of
the site visit. Both approaches are equally valid and can be equally
effective, as the investigations of Trafle Mill in Gowerton and White
Rock Copper Works (see In the Classroom) can demonstrate.
The
study began with a talk and slide show given by Gerald Gabb, Education
Officer of the Maritime and Industrial Museum in Swansea. This covered
the main events of the Norman invasion of South Wales and brief visual
descriptions of the Gower castles - including Oystermouth - providing
a useful historical context within which to place the building of the
castle, its subsequent use and eventual demise.
|
|
 |